Category Archive: A-Level Physics

Dec 24

New solar fuel machine “mimics plant life”

In the prototype, sunlight heats a ceria cylinder which breaks down water or carbon dioxide In the prototype, sunlight heats a ceria cylinder which breaks down water or carbon dioxide

A prototype solar device has been unveiled which mimics plant life, turning the Sun’s energy into fuel.

The machine uses the Sun’s rays and a metal oxide called ceria to break down carbon dioxide or water into fuels which can be stored and transported.

Conventional photovoltaic panels must use the electricity they generate in situ, and cannot deliver power at night.

The prototype, which was devised by researchers in the US and Switzerland, uses a quartz window and cavity to concentrate sunlight into a cylinder lined with cerium oxide, also known as ceria.

Ceria has a natural propensity to exhale oxygen as it heats up and inhale it as it cools down.

If as in the prototype, carbon dioxide and/or water are pumped into the vessel, the ceria will rapidly strip the oxygen from them as it cools, creating hydrogen and/or carbon monoxide.

Hydrogen produced could be used to fuel hydrogen fuel cells in cars, for example, while a combination of hydrogen and carbon monoxide can be used to create “syngas” for fuel.

It is this harnessing of ceria’s properties in the solar reactor which represents the major breakthrough, say the inventors of the device. They also say the metal is readily available, being the most abundant of the “rare-earth” metals.

Methane can be produced using the same machine, they say. Refinements needed  The prototype is grossly inefficient, the fuel created harnessing only between 0.7% and 0.8% of the solar energy taken into the vessel. Most of the energy is lost through heat loss through the reactor’s wall or through the re-radiation of sunlight back through the device’s aperture. But the researchers are confident that efficiency rates of up to 19% can be achieved through better insulation and smaller apertures. Such efficiency rates, they say, could make for a viable commercial device. “The chemistry of the material is really well suited to this process,” says Professor Sossina Haile of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). “This is the first demonstration of doing the full shebang, running it under (light) photons in a reactor.”

She says the reactor could be used to create transportation fuels or be adopted in large-scale energy plants, where solar-sourced power could be available throughout the day and night. However, she admits the fate of this and other devices in development is tied to whether states adopt a low-carbon policy. “It’s very much tied to policy. If we had a carbon policy, something like this would move forward a lot more quickly,” she told the BBC. It has been suggested that the device mimics plants, which also use carbon dioxide, water and sunlight to create energy as part of the process of photosynthesis. But Professor Haile thinks the analogy is over-simplistic.

“Yes, the reactor takes in sunlight, we take in carbon dioxide and water and we produce a chemical compound, so in the most generic sense there are these similarities, but I think that’s pretty much where the analogy ends.”

The PS10 solar tower plant near Seville, Spain. Mirrors concentrate the sun's power on to a central tower, driving a steam turbine The PS10 solar tower plant near Seville, Spain. Mirrors concentrate the sun’s power on to a central tower, driving a steam turbine

Daniel Davies, chief technology officer at the British photovoltaic company Solar Century, said the research was “very exciting”.

“I guess the question is where you locate it – would you put your solar collector on a roof or would it be better off as a big industrial concern in the Sahara and then shipping the liquid fuel?” he said.

Solar technology is moving forward apace but the overriding challenges remain ones of efficiency, economy and storage.

New-generation “solar tower” plants have been built in Spain and the United States which use an array of mirrors to concentrate sunlight onto tower-mounted receivers which drive steam turbines.

A new Spanish project will use molten salts to store heat from the Sun for up to 15 hours, so that the plant could potentially operate through the night.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.animatedscience.co.uk/2010/new-solar-fuel-machine-mimics-plant-life

Dec 02

Famous Scientists

Arrhenius Svante, August
19. 12. 1859 – 2. 10. 1927
Prof. of physics, Sweden
Theory of electolytical dissoziation, kinetics, geophysics, cosmology, arrhenius equation
Nobel Prize in 1903
see chapter 6.2
Avogadro Lorenzo Romano Amadeo Carlo, Conte di Quaregna e Ceretto
9. 8. 1776 – 9. 7. 1856
Prof. of mathematics, Italy
Founder of the modern molecular theory
see chapter 1.1
Balmer Johann, Jacob
1. 5. 1825 – 23. 3. 1898
Teacher, Switzerland
Emission lines of Hydrogen, empirical derivation of the Balmer formula
see chapter 2.3
Becquerel Antoine, Henri
15. 12. 1852 – 25. 8. 1908
Prof. of physics, France
Discoverer of the radioactivity of uranium, sun spectra, IR spectra, polarized light, phosphorescence
Nobel Prize in 1903
see chapter 2.3
Berzelius Jöns, Jakob, Baron
20. 8. 1779 – 7. 8. 1848
Prof. of chemistry, Sweden
Developer of the organic elementary analysis, discoverer of the element cerium, introduction of several lab tools, reaction of Alkaline metals with electric current.
see chapter 8.4
Bohr Nils, Henrik, David
7. 10. 1885 – 8. 11. 1962
Prof. of physics, Danmark
Atomphysics, theoretical physics, atomic model.
Nobel Prize of physics in 1922
see chapter 2.3
Boltzmann Ludwig
20. 2. 1844 – 5. 9. 1906
Prof. of physics and mathematics, Austria
Atomistics, confirmation of Maxwells equations, kinetic gas theory, entropy
see chapter 6.3
Boyle Robert
25. 1. 1627 – 30. 12. 1691
Chemist, England
Connection of pressure and volume of air
see chapter 1.3
Broglie Prince, Louis-Victor de
15. 8. 1892 – 19. 3. 1987
Prof. of theoretical physics, France
Field theory, microwaves, dualism of the matter, wave mechanics
Nobel Prize in physics in 1929
see chapter 2.3
Bronsted Johannes, Nicolaus
22. 2. 1879 – 17. 12. 1947
Prof. of physics, Danmark
Kinetics, indicators, developer of a new acid base terminology
see chapter 7.1
Bunsen Robert, Wilhelm
30. 3. 1811 – 16. 8. 1899
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Electric metallurgy, developer of the water jet pump, Bunsen burner, calorimeter. Developer of spectral analysis and iodometry. Discoverer of the element Cesium
Chadwick Sir James
20. 10. 1891 – 23. 7. 1974
Prof. of physics, England
Charge of the nucleus, dispersion of a particles, discoverer of the neutron in 1932
Nobel Prize for the discovery of the neutron in 1935
see chapter 2.2
Crick Francis, Harry, Compton
8. 6. 1916 -
Prof. of chemistry, USA
X ray diffraction of collagen and ceratin. Structure of the DNA.
Nobel Prize in 1962
see chapter 9.9
Crutzen Paul, J.
3. 12. 1933 -
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Atmospheric chemistry, Ozone hole
Nobel Prize for his work in atmosperic chemistry in 1995
see chapter 6.5
Curie Marie, born Sklodowsa
7. 11. 1867 – 4. 7. 1934
Prof. of physics, Poland
Radioactivity, discoverer of the elements Polonium and Radon.
Nobel Prizes in physics in 1903 and in chemistry in 1911
see chapter 2.2
Dalton John
6. 9. 1766 – 27. 7. 1844
Student of nature and teacher, England
Atomic theory, partial pressure of gases, conservation of mass, stochiometry
see chapter 1.4
Daniell John, Frederic
12. 3. 1790 – 13. 3. 1845
Prof. of chemistry, England
Electrochemistry, meteorology, hygrometer, water barometer, developer of the Daniell element
see chapter 8.2
Davy Humphry, Sir
17. 12. 1778 – 25. 9. 1829
Prof. of chemistry, England
Electrochemistry, electrolysis of Sodium, Potassium and Aluminium. Discovery of the elements Sodium and Potassium
see chapter 8.4
Demokritos of Abdera
about 460 – 371 before Christ
Greek Philosopher
see chapter 1.1
Eijkman Christiaan
11. 8. 1858 – 5. 11. 1930
Prof. of hygienics and forensic medizine, Netherlands
Dutch tropical hygienist, Beri-Beri disease
see chapter 12.1
Gay-Lussac Joseph, Louis
6. 12. 1778 – 9. 5. 1850
Prof. of chemistry and physics, France
Works on gas theory, diffusion, measurement of steam density, fermentation, synthesis of sulfuric acid
see chapter 1.3
Gibbs Josiah, Willard
11. 2. 1839 – 28. 4. 1903
Prof. of theoretical physics
Thermodynamics, thermal dissociation, surface tension, chemical potential, phase rule
see chapter 6.3
Guldberg Cato, Maximilian
11. 8. 1836 – 14. 1. 1902
Prof. of applied mathematics, Norway
Thermodynamics, chemical equilibrium, law of mass action
see chapter 6.4
Haber Fritz
9. 12. 1868 – 29. 1. 1934
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Development of the synthesis of Ammonia, Haber Bosch process
Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1918
see chapter 6.5
Heisenberg Werner, Karl
5. 12. 1901 – 1. 2. 1976
Prof. of theoretical physics, Germany
Quantum mechanics
Nobel Prize in physics in 1932
see chapter 2.3
Hopkins Sir Frederick, Gowland
20. 6. 1861 – 16. 5. 1947
Leader of the Sir William Dunn Institute, England
Biochemist, vitamines, method of measurement of uric acid in urine, colorants of insects
see chapter 12.1
Hund Friederich
4. 2. 1896 – 31. 3. 1997
Prof. of theoretical physics, Germany
Quantum theory, atomic structure, orbital theory, Hund’s rule
see chapter 2.3
Kekulé von Stradonitz August
7. 9. 1829 – 13. 7. 1896
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Mercury compounds, bond theory
see chapter 9.4
Kirchhoff Gustav, Robert
12. 3. 1824 – 17. 10. 1887
Prof. of physics, Germany
Basic laws of electromagnetic radiation, spectral analysis, discovery of the elements Rubidium and Cesium
see chapter 10.1
Lavoisier Antoine, Laurent de
26. 8. 1743 – 8. 5. 1794
Chemist, France
Application of quantitaive measurement methods in chemistry
see chapter 1.4
Le Châtelier Henry, Louis
8. 10. 1850 – 17. 9. 1936
Prof. of chemistry, France
Development of the thermo element (Le Châtelier pyrometer), principle of the smallest stress
see chapter 6.4
Leukippos   of Milet
about 490 – 420 before Christ
Greek philosopher
Founder of the atomic theory, confirmed the term “Atomos”, discoverer of the laws of causality
see chapter 1.1
Lewis Gilbert, Newton
23. 10. 1875 – 23. 3. 1946
Prof. of chemistry, USA
Thermodynamics, valence theory, explanation of the structures of the Ammonium ion and the Chlorine moelcule. Enemy of the atomic model presented by Niels Bohr, acid base theory, separation of isotopes
see chapter 6.3
Liebig Justus, Freiherr von
12. 5. 1803 – 18. 4. 1873
Prof. of cheistry, Germany
Elementary analysis, metabolism of plants and animals, ideas of isomerism
see chapter 9.1
Lyman   Theodore
23. 11. 1874 – 11. 10. 1954
Prof. of mathematics and natural philosophy, USA
Spectral lines of Hydrogen, development of the vacuum spectrograph, confirmation of the atomic model of Niels Bohr
see chapter 2.3
Mariotte   Edme
ca. 1620 – 12. 5. 1684
Prof. of physics, France
Interpretation of Boyle-Mariotts gas law, hydro- and aerostatics, growth and feeding of plants, water cycles on earth, discoverer of the blind spot in a human eye.
see chapter 1.3
Markownikoff Vladimir, Vasilevic
25. 12. 1838 – 11. 2. 1904
Prof. of chemistry, Russia
Study of petroleum and cycloalkanes
see chapter 9.4
Mendelejew Dimitrij, Ivanovic
8. 2. 1834 – 2. 2. 1907
Prof. of chemistry, Russia
Development of the periodic table of the elements, critical temperature, atomic weight
Prediction of undiscovered elements in 1869. Element number 101 is named by Mendelejew
see chapter 2.2
Meyer Julius, Lothar
19. 8. 1830 – 11. 4. 1895
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Confirmation of the law of mass action. Periodic table of the elements, relation of atomic volume and atomic weight
see chapter 2.2
Mullikan Robert, Sanderson
7. 6. 1896 – 31. 10. 1986
Prof. of chemistry and physics, USA
Research of the molecular structure, separation of isotopes, calculation of fine structures of diatomic gases of their spectra
Nobel Prize in 1966
Nernst Walter, Herrmann
25. 6. 1864 – 18. 11. 1941
Prof. of physical chemistry, Germany
Thermochemistry, thermodynamics, osmotic theory of galvanic cells, 3rd law of thermodynamics
Nobel Prize in 1920
see chapter 8.2
Newton Isaac, Sir
4. 1. 1643 – 31. 3. 1727
Physcist, mathematician and astronomist
Laws of gravitation, flow dynamics, mechanics
see chapter 10.1
Nobel Alfred
21. 10. 1833 – 10. 12. 1896
Chemist, Sweden
Explosives, nitroglycerine, dynamite, electrolytical synthesis of alkaline metals, artificial jewels, artificial silk, fotography. His testament is the base of the Nobel foundation.
Pauli Wolfgang
25. 4. 1900 – 15. 12. 1958
Prof. of physics, ETHZ
Relativity theory, quantum theory, atomic structure, wave mechanics, periodic table, development of Pauli-principle, prediction of neutrons and mesons
Nobel Prize in physics in 1945
see chapter 2.3
Pauling Linus, Carl
28. 2. 1901 – 19. 8. 1994
Prof. of chemistry, USA
Theoretical studys of chemical bonds, structures of antibodies, basics of anesthesia
Nobel Prize in 1954
see chapter 3.2
Planck Max, Karl, Ernst, Ludwig
23. 4. 1858 – 4. 10. 1947
Prof. of physics, Germany
Mechanical heat theory, entropy, equilibrium in thermochemistry, relativity theory, quantisation of energy
Nobel Prize in physics in 1918
see chapter 10.1
Priestley Joseph
13. 3. 1733 – 6. 2. 1804
Theologist and chemist, England
Photosynthesis. Discoverer of Oxygen, Carbon monoxide, Hydrogen chloride, Ammonia, Sulfur dioxide, laughing gas and Nitrogen oxide. Production of mineral water.
Rutherford Lord Ernest, Baron of Nelson
30. 8. 1871 – 19. 10. 1937
Prof. of chemistry, New Zeeland
Radioactivity, atomic model
Nobel Prize in 1908
see chapter 2.1
Scheele Carl, Wilhelm
9. 12. 1742 – 21. 5. 1786
Pharmacist, Sweden
Discoverer of Chlorine, tartaric acid, oxalic acid, lactic acid, citric acid. Photochemistry with silver compounds, Oxidation of metals.
Schrödinger Erwin
12. 8. 1887 – 4. 1. 1961
Prof. of theoretical physics, Germany
Wave mechanics (Schrödinger equation), atomphysics, quantum theory
Nobel Prize in physics in 1933
siehe chapter 2.3
Seaborg Glenn, Theodore
19. 4. 1912 -
Prof. of chemistry, USA
Studys on nuclear energy, discoverer of the transuranium elements
Nobel Prize in 1951
see chapter 2.2
Sorensen Soren, Peter, Laurits
9. 1. 1868 – 12. 2. 1939
Prof. of chemistry, Danmark
Concentration of Hydronium ions, pH value, acid base terminology, enzymes, biochemistry
see chapter 7.2
Staudinger Hermann
23. 3. 1881 – 8. 9. 1965
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Artificial compounds, Cellulose, caoutchouc, basics of proteine chemistry
Nobel Prize in 1953
see chapter 9.7
Thomson Sir Joseph, John
18. 12. 1856 – 30. 8. 1940
Prof. of physics, England
Atomphysics, discoverer of the free electron in 1897
Nobel Prize in 1906: Penetration of electricity through a gas
see chapter 2.1
Thomson William, Lord Kelvin of Largs
26. 6. 1824 – 17. 12. 1907
Prof. of physics, Scottland
Second law of thermodynamics, Joule-Thomson-effect, electric scales, electric capacity.
see chapter 1.2
Van der Waals Johannes, Diderik
23. 11. 1837 – 8. 3. 1923
Prof. of physics, Netherlands
State of gas, liquids and steam. Thermodynamics, interparticular forces
Nobel Prize in physics in 1910
see chapter 3.5
Van’t Hoff Jacobus, Henricus
30. 8. 1852 – 1. 3. 1911
Prof. of natural sciences, Netherlands
Studys on stereochemistry, Basics of chirality, optical activity, kinetics, relation between temperature and rate constant, osmosis
Nobel Prize in 1901
see chapter 6.2
Volta Alessandro, Graf
Physicist, Italy
18. 2. 1745 – 15. 3. 1827
Sequel of Galvanis studys, thermal expansion of a gas, electric current, electroscope, voltage dependency
see chapter 8.2
Waage   Peter
29. 6. 1833 – 13. 1. 1900
Prof. of chemistry, Norway
Chemical equilibrium. Law of mass action in 1867 together with Cato Maximilian Guldberg
see chapter 6.4
Watson James, Dewey
6. 4. 1928 -
Prof. of molecular biology
Structure of DNA, studys on virus
Nobel Prize in 1962
see chapter 9.9
Winkler Clemens
26. 12. 1838 – 8. 10. 1904
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Analysis of gas, development of the industrial synthesis of sulfuric acid, discoverer of the element Germanium
Wöhler Friederich
31. 7. 1800 – 23. 9. 1882
Prof. of chemistry, Germany
Substitution reactions, studys on high pressures and high temperatures, synthesis of urea from Ammonium cyanate 1828
see chapter 9.1

Permanent link to this article: http://www.animatedscience.co.uk/2010/famous-scientists

Dec 01

3D Invisibility Cloak unveiled

3-D invisibility cloak hides gold “bump” The first device to hide an object in three dimensions has been unveiled by a group of physicists in the UK and Germany. While the design only cloaks micro-scale objects from near-infrared wavelengths, the researchers claim that there is nothing in principle to prevent their design from being scaled up to hide much larger artefacts from visible light. The origins of this design date back to 2006, when David Smith and colleagues at Duke University in North Carolina created a cloak that could bend microwaves around an object, like water flowing around a smooth stone.

This early cloak was made using a metamaterial – an artificially constructed material with unusual electromagnetic or other properties – which consisted of a cylinder built up from concentric rings of copper split-ring resonators. This first cloak, however, only worked in two dimensions – in other words, looking at the cylinder from above revealed the presence of the shielded object.

Carpet cloak Now Tolga Ergin and colleagues at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany, together with John Pendry of Imperial College in London, have overcome this problem by creating a “carpet cloak”. Proposed in 2008 by Pendry and Jensen Li, this involves hiding an object underneath a bump on the surface of an otherwise smooth material – just as something might be hidden under a carpet – and then smoothing out the resulting bump. This is achieved by creating a bump on a flat mirror and then placing onto the mirror a layer of metamaterial with optical properties such that light appears to reflect off the mirror as if the bump were not there. This technique was demonstrated experimentally at two different wavelengths last year, with Smith’s group showing that it worked in the microwave region while researchers at Berkeley and Cornell University near New York obtained similar results at infrared wavelengths. However, these cloaks were also limited to just two dimensions.

Ergin’s group has made a carpet cloak in three dimensions by stacking nanofabricated silicon wafers on top of one another in a “woodpile” matrix and then filling in the gaps between the wafers with varying amounts of polymer. This achieves the desired distribution of refractive indices within the structure. Hiding the bump The cloak structure was then placed on top of a reflective gold surface containing a bump, leading to a cloaking effect using unpolarized light with wavelengths between 1.4 and 2.7 µm – the near-infrared. Importantly, this effect held for viewing angles up to 60 degrees (with zero degrees representing viewing in just two dimensions).

 The bump, however, was very small – just 30 µm (10–6 m) × 10 µm × 1 µm. Team member Martin Wegener says it should be possible to use existing technology to make the cloak bigger in order to hide larger objects, but that this approach would be extremely time-consuming. “Faster nanofabrication tools will have to be developed allowing for three-dimensional structures,” he adds. For Wegener the aim of the work is not about focusing all efforts on creating invisibility cloaks, but is about exploring a range of applications in transformation optics.

This involves calculating what kind of material is needed to bend light in a certain way, by considering light trajectories as the result of the warping of space. Wegener says that transformation optics should lead, for example, to the design of better antennas or smaller optical resonators. Smith describes the latest work as “very exciting” and agrees that its real importance lies in the development of transformation optics. “Demonstrations like these are paving the way for transformation optical design to become an established design methodology, like ray-tracing,” he says. The research is published in Science.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.animatedscience.co.uk/2010/3d-invisibility-cloak-unveiled

Nov 15

NASA’S Chandra Finds Youngest Nearby Black Hole

WASHINGTON — Astronomers using NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory have found evidence of the youngest black hole known to exist in our cosmic neighborhood. The 30-year-old black hole provides a unique opportunity to watch this type of object develop from infancy.

The black hole could help scientists better understand how massive stars explode, which ones leave behind black holes or neutron stars, and the number of black holes in our galaxy and others.

The 30-year-old object is a remnant of SN 1979C, a supernova in the galaxy M100 approximately 50 million light years from Earth. Data from Chandra, NASA’s Swift satellite, the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton and the German ROSAT observatory revealed a bright source of X-rays that has remained steady during observation from 1995 to 2007. This suggests the object is a black hole being fed either by material falling into it from the supernova or a binary companion.

“If our interpretation is correct, this is the nearest example where the birth of a black hole has been observed,” said Daniel Patnaude of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass. who led the study.

The scientists think SN 1979C, first discovered by an amateur astronomer in 1979, formed when a star about 20 times more massive than the sun collapsed. Many new black holes in the distant universe previously have been detected in the form of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs).

However, SN 1979C is different because it is much closer and belongs to a class of supernovas unlikely to be associated with a GRB. Theory predicts most black holes in the universe should form when the core of a star collapses and a GRB is not produced.

“This may be the first time the common way of making a black hole has been observed,” said co-author Abraham Loeb, also of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “However, it is very difficult to detect this type of black hole birth because decades of X-ray observations are needed to make the case.”

The idea of a black hole with an observed age of only about 30 years is consistent with recent theoretical work. In 2005, a theory was presented that the bright optical light of this supernova was powered by a jet from a black hole that was unable to penetrate the hydrogen envelope of the star to form a GRB. The results seen in the observations of SN 1979C fit this theory very well.

Although the evidence points to a newly formed black hole in SN 1979C, another intriguing possibility is that a young, rapidly spinning neutron star with a powerful wind of high energy particles could be responsible for the X-ray emission. This would make the object in SN 1979C the youngest and brightest example of such a “pulsar wind nebula” and the youngest known neutron star. The Crab pulsar, the best-known example of a bright pulsar wind nebula, is about 950 years old.

“It’s very rewarding to see how the commitment of some of the most advanced telescopes in space, like Chandra, can help complete the story,” said Jon Morse, head of the Astrophysics Division at NASA’s Science Mission Directorate.

The results will appear in the New Astronomy journal in a paper by Patnaude, Loeb, and Christine Jones of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for the agency’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls Chandra’s science and flight operations from Cambridge.

For more information about Chandra, including images and other multimedia, visit:

http://chandra.nasa.gov

and

http://chandra.harvard.edu

Permanent link to this article: http://www.animatedscience.co.uk/2010/nasas-chandra-finds-youngest-nearby-black-hole

Oct 29

The Hydrogen Bomb…Teller–Ulam

File:Teller-Ulam device 3D.svg

This is part of a great Wikipedia Article, read more here….

The Teller–Ulam design is the nuclear weapon design concept used in most of the world’s nuclear weapons.  It is colloquially referred to as “the secret of the hydrogen bomb” because it employs hydrogen fusion to generate neutrons. However, in most applications the bulk of its destructive energy comes from uranium fission, not hydrogen fusion. It is named for its two chief contributors, Edward Teller and Stanisław Ulam, who developed it in 1951 for the United States. It was first used in multi-megaton-range thermonuclear weapons. As it is also the most efficient design concept for small nuclear weapons, today virtually all the nuclear weapons deployed by the five major nuclear-armed nations use the Teller–Ulam design.

Its essential features, which officially remained secret for nearly three decades, are:

  1. separation of stages into a triggering “primary” explosive and a much more powerful “secondary” explosive.
  2. compression of the secondary by X-rays coming from nuclear fission in the primary, a process called the “radiation implosion” of the secondary.
  3. heating of the secondary, after cold compression, by a second fission explosion inside the secondary.

The radiation implosion mechanism is a heat engine exploiting the temperature difference between the hot radiation channel, surrounding the secondary, and the relatively cool interior of the secondary. This temperature difference is briefly maintained by a massive heat barrier called the “pusher”. The pusher is also an implosion tamper, increasing and prolonging the compression of the secondary, and, if made of uranium, which it usually is, it undergoes fission by capturing the neutrons produced by fusion. In most Teller–Ulam weapons, fission of the pusher dominates the explosion and produces radioactive fission product fallout.

The first test of this principle was the “Ivy Mikenuclear test in 1952, conducted by the United States. In the Soviet Union, the design was known as Andrei Sakharov‘s “Third Idea“, first tested in 1955. Similar devices were developed by the United Kingdom, China, and France, though no specific code names are known for their designs

Permanent link to this article: http://www.animatedscience.co.uk/2010/the-hydrogen-bomb-teller%e2%80%93ulam

Oct 28

Neutron Stars – from BBC…

Neutron star packs two Suns’ mass in London-sized space 

Artist's concept of a pulsar (SPL) Pulsars are so-called because of the way their radio emission is detected at Eart. Astronomers have discovered what they say is the mightiest neutron star yet. The super-dense object, which lies some 3,000 light-years from Earth, is about twice as massive as our Sun. That is 20% greater than the previous record holder, the US-Dutch team behind the observation tells the journal Nature.

Like all neutron stars, the object’s matter is packed into an incredibly small space probably no bigger than the centre of a big city like London. “The typical size of a neutron star is something like 10km in radius,” said Dr Paul Demorest from the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO), Charlottesville, US. The size is easy to understand but the densitiy is much more extreme than anything we know here on Earth.

“It’s approximately the size of a city, which for an astronomical object is interesting because people can conceive of it pretty easily; and yet in that space it has the mass in this case about two times our Sun. So the size is easy to understand but the densitiy is much more extreme than anything we know here on Earth,” the study’s lead author told BBC News.

Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia (NRAO)The finding is important, says Dr Demorest’s team, because it puts constraints on the type of exotic material that can form a neutron star. Such objects are thought to be the remnant cores of once giant stars that blew themselves apart at the ends of their lives. Theory holds that all atomic material not dispersed in this supernova blast collapses to form a body made up almost entirely of neutrons – the tiny particles that appear in the nuclei of many atoms. As well being fantastically compact, the cores also spin incredibly fast. This particular object, classified as PSR J1614-2230, revolves 317 times a second. It is what is termed a pulsar – so-called because it sends out lighthouse-like beams of radio waves that are seen as radio “pulses” every time they sweep over the Earth.

  The observations were made using the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia. The pulses are akin to the ticks of a clock, and the properties of stable neutron stars make for ultra-precise time-pieces. This was how the team, observing with the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia, was able to measure the object’s mass. Because PSR J1614-2230 also circles a companion star, its pulses – as received at Earth – are disturbed by the neighbour’s gravity.

“The way it works is that as the pulses travel from the neutron star past the companion, they slow down a little bit. And how we see that on Earth is that the pulses arrive a little later than we would otherwise expect when the neutron star is lined up behind the companion,” Dr Demorest said.

The team could use this effect to calculate the masses of both bodies. The group reports a pulsar mass 1.97 times that of our Sun – significantly greater than the previous precise record of 1.67 solar masses. The result is said to put limits on the type of dense matter that can make up the cores of these bizarre objects. Some scientists had suggested exotic particles such as hyperons, kaon condensates or free quarks could exist deep inside neutron stars. But Dr Demorest and colleagues believe their observations preclude this possibility. “It’s simply that if those particles were formed, the star would get too dense and collapse into a black hole prior to this point,” the NRAO researcher said.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.animatedscience.co.uk/2010/neutron-stars-from-bbc

» Newer posts